Vox appeals mainly to pathos in this article about why some audience members of the movie "Coco" dislike the opening short. The strong title is the first indicator of an appeal to pathos, the use of the word "hate" makes the topic seem more severe than it actually is. The article appeals to credibility by including Tweets, a means to show a "popular opinion" and identify the people mentioned in the title. The appeal to logos is the explanation of why Disney allowed this 21-minute long short to be included in their production. Vox explains that ever since Disney and Pixar were paired together, Pixar has made content that is more marketable to supply to the demands of Disney. In this case, they created this to bridge a gap for a future Frozen movie. They also include the fact that the short was removed entirely in Mexican viewings to show how much consumers hate the Frozen short.
Find the article here:
https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/11/25/16697898/coco-short-olafs-frozen-adventure-hate-pixar
0 Comments
|
AuthorMy name is Kobe Lester, and I want to see what makes Vox news appealing. Tell me any points that you have and I will look for them in other videos by Vox news. Archives
February 2018
Categories |